In short, yes. When talking about two separate entities, funnier is the way to go. It is the comparative of funny.
Is funner a correct word?
Definition: More (or Most) Amusing or Enjoyable I am sad that “funner” and “funnest” are not proper words. We may often use fun as an adjective today (‘I had a fun time’), but when the word first entered the English language at the end of the 17th century it was mostly used as a verb or a noun.
Is more funny correct English?
So in answer to your question, you most certainly can choose to use “more funny” or “most funny” instead of “funnier” or “funniest,” and not be alone and unprecedented in your word choice. But as you know, the overwhelming tendency in English runs in the other direction.
Why is funnest not a word?
Funnest is a regular superlative of the adjective fun. However, the use of fun as an adjective is itself still often seen as informal or casual and to be avoided in formal writing, and this would apply equally to the superlative form.
Is Nicer correct grammar?
Senior Member. Both grammatically correct, but “nicer” is by far the more common idiom.
Do we say happier or more happy?
With common 2-syllable adjectives/adverbs, the ‘-er’ comparative is more usual; with uncommon or unusually pronounced 2-syllable adjectives/adverbs, the ‘more’ form is in use as well and may be more usual. There is nothing ‘wrong’ with ‘more happy’, but ‘happier’ is the usual.
Is stupider a word Webster?
Stupider and stupidest are real words in good standing. While there are many (contradictory) rules on comparative and superlative adjectives, there is no rule against stupider and stupidest, and the words have a long history of usage.
Why is very fun wrong?
Fun is a noun and real and adjective. The problem with very fun is that very is an intensive and you can’t use an intensive to modify a noun, usually. Because if you use “fun” as an adjective (as I usually do), “really” is the adverb that modifies it.
What is comparative of funny?
Comparative. funnier. Superlative. funniest. The comparative form of funny; more funny.
Is stupider a bad word?
The form of an adjective determines how you form the comparative. But the major dictionaries would disagree; stupider is commonly cited as the correct comparative form of the adjective stupid. Stupider is grammatically correct, it is a real word, and it’s been in use for at least the last two hundred years.
Can I say nicer?
words and music Well, however we choose to speak in our current vernacular, the correct wording is “nicer”–nice, nicer, nicest. Some words use “more” in front to designate greater amounts, but there are standard rules for that, also.
Is Nicer a Scrabble word?
Nicer is valid Scrabble Word.
Is “Funner” a real word?
Irregardless. If you say “irregardless” or write it,you are basically confirming that you are a moron.” -User Comment on “Irregardless,” Merriam-Webster.com
Is “funnest” really a word?
Funnest is a regular superlative of the adjective fun. However, the use of fun as an adjective is itself still often seen as informal or casual and to be avoided in formal writing, and this would apply equally to the superlative form.
Is funnest or Funner a word?
If you want to consider “fun,” as an adjective, a word, then “funner” is indeed a word, as is “funnest,” per normal rules of adjective formation. But this doesn’t mean that “more fun” and “most fun” are incorrect, though; in fact, in formal writing, you’ll probably still want to use those instead of “funner” and “funnest.”
Should Funner be a word?
Merriam-Webster defines fun as a noun or adjective. You can say that you had “a fun evening” so it clearly can be used as an adjective. Therefore, words “funner” or “funnest” should be considered actual words as long as words such as “hotter” and “longest” are acceptable.
