The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular area of research. The review should enumerate, describe, summarize, objectively evaluate and clarify this previous research. It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research.
What is wrong with traditional literature reviews?
Traditional literature reviews often lack thoroughness and rigor and are conducted ad hoc, rather than following a specific methodology. Therefore, questions can be raised about the quality and trustworthiness of these types of reviews.
Is a literature review a research methodology?
This is generally referred to as the “literature review,” “theoretical framework,” or “research background.” However, for a literature review to become a proper research methodology, as with any other research, follow proper steps need to be followed and action taken to ensure the review is accurate, precise, and trustworthy.
What can hinder a full systematic review process?
Instead, when wanting to study a broader topic that has been conceptualized differently and studied within diverse disciplines, this can hinder a full systematic review process.
What is a social sciences literature review?
A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.
What is the body of literature in a research paper?
The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences.
What is an example of a conclusion in a literature review?
Example of a Literature Review Conclusion. Here is an example of a literature review conclusion: ” The objective of this review was to view the trends in composition studies within the past fifty years and see how commentary on student writing has transformed and is still transforming.
